with respect to use of DGPS and large scale mapping. There is also a requirement for refinements of casi remote sensing techniques, particularly development of a more extensive spectral library and more detailed study of methods to distinguish key habitat and vegetation types. Similar refinements are needed for subtidal habitats and ASC methods. Coastal ecologists need to focus on development of habitat classification systems that enable the bridging of field biological data with remote sensing and GIS. It is unlikely that technology will ever replace the good judgment of an experienced ecologist, but remote sensing may remove the subjectivity of some traditional habitat mapping methods. The effectiveness of coastal habitat surveys can therefore be improved by deploying small teams involving specialists in remote sensing, GIS, and field ecology.
I. Acknowledgments
Work described this report was supported by the Department of Fisheries and Oceans Habitat Action Plan, Environmental Analysis component.
J. Literature cited
1. Bornhold, B., R. Currie, D. Fox, J. Golden, H. Olynyk and D. Johnson. 1996. Habitat mapping southern Oregon continental shelf. p. 27-33. In: T. Curran (Editor). Proceedings of the Ocean Feature Classification Workshop. Institute of Ocean Sciences, Sidney, British Columbia, May 3, 1996.
2. Burrough, P.A. 1986. Principles of Geographic Information Systems for Land Resources Assessment. Claredon Press. Oxford. 194 p.
3. Cripps, K. 1996. Geoduck and sea cucumber surveys using RoxAnn (1994-95 surveys). p. 9-15. In: T. Curran (Editor). Proceedings of the Ocean Feature Classification Workshop, Institute of Ocean Sciences, Sidney, British Columbia, May 3 1996.
4. Curran, T. (Ed.). 1995. Remote sensing techniques for subtidal classification. Proceedings of a workshop organized by Kitasoo First Nations Fisheries Program, Resource Inventory Committee of B. C., Canadian Hydrographic Service. Institute of Ocean Sciences. March 17, 1995. Available on the World Wide Web at http://www.ios.bc.ca/ios/chs.
5. Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO). 1986. Policy of the Management of Fish Habitat. Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Ottawa, Ontario. Cat. No. Fs23-23- 98/1986E. 28 p.
6. Dobson, JE., E.A. Bright, R.L. Ferguson, D.W. Field, L.L. Wood, K.D. Haddad, H. Iredale III. J.R. Jensen, V.V. Klemas, R.J. Orth and J.P. Thomas. 1995. NOAA Coastal Change Analysis Program (C-CAP): Guidance for Regional Implementation. NOAA Tech. Rep. NMFS 123. 92 p.
7. Durance, C. 1996. Eelgrass habitat assessment. p. 42-51. In: W.C. Austin, S.P. Leys and C. Durance, 1996. Saanich Inlet Study: Sensitive Habitats and Biota. B.C. Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks, Victoria, B.C. (also available on the World Wide Web at
http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/epd/wqb).
8. Echeverria, S.W. and P.J. Rutten. 1989. Inventory of eelgrass (Zostera marina L). in San Francisco/San Pablo Bay. NOAA Southwest Region, National Marine Fisheries Service, Terminal Island, California.
Administrative Report October 1989. 18 p.
9. Foreman, R.E. 1975. KIM-1: a method for inventory of floating kelps and its application to selected areas of kelp licence Area 12: final report. BERP Report 75-1. University of British Columbia Botany Department. 21 p.
10. Howes, D.E, P. Wainwright. J. Haggarty, J.H. Harper, E. Owens, D. Reimer, K. Summers, J. Cooper. L. Berg and R. Baird. 1993. Coastal Resources and Oil Spill Response Atlas for the Southern Strait of Georgia. B.C. Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks, Environmental Emergencies Coordination Office, Victoria, B.C. 317 p.
11. Lessard, J., C.D. Levings, M.S. North, and D.J.H. Nishimura. 1996a. An annotated bibliography of fish habitat maps for the Strait of Georgia. Can. Manuscr. Rep. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2350. 31 p + app
12. Lessard. J., MS. North, C.D. Levings and D.J.H. Nishimura, 1996b. Field survey report for Saanich Inlet eelgrass, July 1995. Can. Data Rep. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 975. 29 p.
13. Levings, C.D. 1995, Natural factors to be considered in restoration of marine and estuarine ecosystems supporting fisheries. Proceedings of the Osaka-Wan Symposium, Kobe, Japan, June 5-7, 1995. p. 65-68 (English); p. 69-70 (Japanese).
14. Levings, C.D. 1996. Compensation and mitigation techniques used to assist fish habitat management in British Columbia estuaries. Proceedings of the Sumoto City International Marine Symposium, July 18-20 1996. p. 81-85 (English); p.87-90 (Japanese).
15. Levings, C.D. and R.M. Thom. 1994. Habitat changes in Georgia Basin: implications for resource management and restoration. p. 330-351. In: R.C.H. Wilson, R.J. Beamish, F. Aitkens and J. Bell (Eds.). Review of the Marine Environment and Biota of Strait of Georgia, Puget Sound and Juan de Fuca Strait. Can. Tech. Rep. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1948.
16. North, MS. 1996. Intertidal fish habitat classification studies undertaken as part of the DFO marine foreshore fish habitat assessment project. p. 36-40. In: T. Curran (Ed.). Proceedings of the Ocean Feature Classification Workshop, Institute of Ocean Sciences, Sidney, British Columbia, May 3 1996.
17. Odum. W.E. 1970. Insidious alteration of the estuarine environment. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 99:836-847.
18. Resource Inventory Committee. 1995. Standards for Terrestrial Ecosystems Mapping in British Columbia. Prepared for the Ecosystems Working Group of the Terrestrial Ecosystems Task Force. 840 Cormorant Street, Victoria, B.C. Canada V8W 1R1. 190 p. (draft).
19. Simenstad, C.A., M. Diether, CD. Levings and D.E. Hay. 1997 The terrestrial/Marine Interface in The Environment and People of the Coastal Temperate Rain Forest. Island Press, New York (in press).
20. Thomson, R.E. 1981, Oceanography of the British Columbia coast. Can. Spec. Pub. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 56. 291 p.
21.Waldichuk, M. 1990. Industrial and domestic pollution in the North Pacific. Trans. Royal Society Canada, Series 1, Volume 1 (1990): 387-433.
